Updated Approach To Customer Damaged Returns
Using a Rolling Desk For Increased Productivity
Amazon/Nike Partnership Confirmed by Bloomberg

Updated Approach To Customer Damaged Returns

Back in January I made a post talking about how to get reimbursed for items that buyers bought, used and returned damaged. Over the past couple months Amazon has really been cracking down on reimbursing for items that were damaged by customers. I have been getting a lot of “boilerplate” responses similar to the one quoted below.


“I strongly believe that all the units you send to our fulfillment center are perfectly fine. However, the unit disposition will be based on the return reason of the customer. And only our Customer Service team has the detailed information about the reasons for returns and refunds of the buyer. Information provided in the “FBA Customer Returns” report is what we can utilized of.

As you may know that in accordance with Amazon policy, sellers are requested to accept the return in the disposition which the buyer has returned the item in. Please be informed that Amazon does not take responsibility for the returned items that come in “customer damaged” or “defective” disposition.

A returned unit is considered unsellable when either of the following is true:

• It is not in the same condition as previously listed
• Product is defective, damaged, opened, lacking required labeling, prohibited by our policies, or is otherwise deemed unsuitable by Amazon, including units which may pose a health or safety risk to our associates or the next customer who purchases it (this may include, but is not restricted to consumables, personal care products and products with expiration dates).

In this case I request you to understand that amazon takes responsibility in all the cases/disposition/return reasons except the two given below:
• Customer damaged
• Defective

Disposition covered by amazon, (some of them are)
○ Damaged
○ Missing parts
○ Missed estimated delivery date
○ Carrier damaged
○ Carrier missorted

I understand your next question would be why we accept customer damaged and defective returns. We believe that making exceptions in instances like these are a small sacrifice keeping in mind the future. One of the most attractive selling points of our business is our returns policy and as returns are a general part of business, we believe that making exceptions in these instances is a crucial element in promoting growth for you and us in partnership.”

While I understand the reasoning behind Amazon’s liberal return policy as part of their quest to be the “Earth’s Most Customer-Centric Company” it is very frustrating to be responsible for refunding people who are obviously taking advantage of Amazon’s policies to “rent” things like running shoes.

When getting pushback from seller support quoting the terms that we agreed to as a Seller I’ve had some limited success quoting the terms that the BUYER agreed to and is supposed to be held to and arguing that if Amazon makes an “exception” that Amazon should be financially responsible for allowing a customer to return a damaged item.

Below is a copy of the message that I’ve been using to follow-up when my reimbursement requests are denied. I’m still not having the super high success rate of around 90% that I was getting before they got stricter but it is working about a third of the time for me so it’s still worth giving it a try.


Thank you for your response to my recent inquiry. Given the fact that the item was returned in damaged/no longer new condition the customer should have been charged a MINIMUM of a 50% restocking fee in accordance with Amazon’s return policies from which I quote below.

“Partial Refunds or Restocking Fees
If You Return:
Items that are damaged, missing parts, not in the original condition, or have obvious signs of use for reasons not due to an Amazon.com error.

You’ll Receive:
Up to 50% of the item’s price”
Source: https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=201819300

Given the fact that the item in question was returned in a condition that, per Amazon’s terms should have incurred at least a 50% restocking fee I request that you initiate reimbursement to my account for 50% of the sales price of the item in question.

Kind Regards,

Matt Colvin

Give this a try and let me know if it works for you!

Oh, and Go Ship Some Stuff!

Using a Rolling Desk For Increased Productivity

Hi guys! Short post today but I wanted to share a quick “Prep Hack” that has helped me increase the speed with which I am able to process my inventory.

It’s a pretty simple, just get yourself a rolling desk!

This is my rolling desk setup. Making something that I can move around my garage/office made things WAY more efficient for me by reducing the amount of times I needed to handle my inventory and I highly recommend you try it out. Snagged this bad boy off of Craigslist for only $50, goes for $600+ new 😀

Another example of how you can set things up (and what motivated me to finally make a post about this) is this one that Kyle Fedewa posted today on Facebook.

(Thanks for agreeing to let me share this Kyle!)

Kyle got this shelf and wheels from Lowes. His has the added benefit of being able to actually put product on it as he is prepping vs mine which can only hold my Computer, Printers and Scanner. Benefits and drawbacks to both setups but either way I think this helps make prep more productive.

One of the things I like the most about this setup, as well as something that Kyle mentions is that it keeps me on my feet and moving around. For me if I’m on my feet I tend to be more focused on the task around me vs sitting down.

Do you use a standing and/or rolling desk in your prep workflow? If not, why not?

Go Ship Some Stuff!


Amazon/Nike Partnership Confirmed by Bloomberg

Citing a source “familiar with the situation” Bloomberg.com has announced that Nike will begin selling on Amazon although a timeframe was not included in the report.

The reasoning behind the move appears to be that they want to exert more control over how its products are sold and keep knockoffs off the market.

“The approach lets Nike Inc. take greater control over how its products are sold, helping ensure that knockoff shoes aren’t offered by third parties on the e-commerce marketplace, said the person, who asked not to be named because the arrangement isn’t yet public.”

I personally find it somewhat disingenuous that “knockoffs” are the main reason being cited for them deciding on entering the Amazon ecosystem. If you take the amount of sales moving from Brick & Mortar into online sales and combine it with the death of stores like Sports Authority I think that Nike sees the writing on the wall and is finally jumping on board to regain some of the sales it has lost by opening up another sales channel.

As an active Nike seller it’s going to be very interesting seeing how Nike approaches their launch onto the platform and if they let third party sellers continue to sell on various Nike listings (ala-Under Armour) or intend to aggressively attempt to have sellers removed/restricted. Given the fact that as recently as a few weeks ago I confirmed that Amazon had a team dedicated to recruiting larger third party Nike sellers from Ebay and offering to get them approved to sell the brand if they moved to selling on Amazon I find it hard to believe that Amazon will totally restrict everyone from selling all Nike products but only time will tell.

Here is a brief video of some Bloomerg staff discussing the impending deal and it’s implications.

Go Ship Some Stuff!

Copyright © 2014. Created by Meks. Powered by WordPress.